Chrysler Voyager fuel economy (UK)

Official figures for the Chrysler Voyager from the Vehicle Certification Agency's new car lists, 2000–2009: 33 versions after removing repeats between lists. Economy is in UK (imperial) mpg; electric versions show miles per kWh and range instead. In the most recent lists (2001–2009, NEDC) combined economy is 21.2–36.7 mpg.

All figures on this page come from the NEDC test. NEDC was the official test before WLTP. NEDC figures are noticeably more optimistic, so do not compare them with WLTP figures.

NEDC figures, VCA lists 2001–2009

NEDC was the official test before WLTP. NEDC figures are noticeably more optimistic, so do not compare them with WLTP figures.

NEDC figures
VersionFuelCombinedL/100 kmCO₂ g/kmIn lists
Chrysler Voyager
2.5td · 5MT · 2499 cc
Diesel 36.7 mpg 7.7 203 2009
Voyager
2.5td · M5 · 2499 cc
Diesel 36.7 mpg 7.7 203 2007–2009
Chrysler Voyager
2.8td · A4 · 2776 cc
Diesel 29.4 mpg 8.4 221 2009
Voyager
2.8td · A4 · 2776 cc
Diesel 29.4 mpg 8.4 221 2007–2009
Voyager
2.4 · M5 · 2429 cc
Petrol 28.5 mpg 13.5 234 2007–2009
Voyager
2.5CRD SE · M5 · 2499 cc
Diesel 36.7 mpg 7.7 203 2006
Voyager
2.8CRD LX · A4 · 2776 cc
Diesel 29.4 mpg 8.4 221 2006
Voyager
2.4 LX · M5 · 2429 cc
Petrol 28.5 mpg 9.8 235 2005–2006
Voyager
2.4 SE · M5 · 2429 cc
Petrol 28.5 mpg 9.8 235 2005–2006
Voyager
2.5 CRD SE · M5 · 2499 cc
Diesel 36.7 mpg 7.7 203 2005
Voyager
2.8 CRD LX · A4 · 2776 cc
Diesel 29.4 mpg 8.4 221 2005
Voyager
2.5 SWB · M5 · 2499 cc
Diesel 36.7 mpg 7.7 203 2004
Voyager
2.5 LWB · M5 · 2499 cc
Diesel 36.2 mpg 7.8 207 2004
Voyager
2.4 SWB · M5 · 2429 cc
Petrol 28.8 mpg 9.8 235 2004
Voyager
3.3 LWB · A4 · 3301 cc
Petrol 21.2 mpg 13.3 319 2004
Voyager
3.3 SWB · A4 · 3301 cc
Petrol 21.2 mpg 13.3 319 2004
Voyager
2.5 Short Wheel Base · M5 · 2499 cc
Diesel 36.7 mpg 7.7 203 2003
Voyager
2.5 Long Wheel Base · M5 · 2499 cc
Diesel 36.2 mpg 7.8 207 2003
Voyager
2.5 Long Wheel Base · M5 · 2499 cc
Diesel 35.3 mpg 8.0 210 2002–2003
Voyager
2.5 Short Wheel Base · M5 · 2499 cc
Diesel 35.3 mpg 8.0 210 2002–2003
Voyager
2.4 Short Wheel Base · M5 · 2429 cc
Petrol 28.8 mpg 9.8 235 2003
Voyager
2.4 Short Wheel Base · M5 · 2429 cc
Petrol 28.0 mpg 10.1 236 2001–2003
Voyager
3.3 Long Wheel Base · A4 · 3301 cc
Petrol 22.2 mpg 12.7 297 2001–2003
Voyager
3.3 Short Wheel Base · A4 · 3301 cc
Petrol 22.2 mpg 12.7 297 2001–2003
Voyager
3.3 Long Wheel Base · A4 · 3301 cc
Petrol 21.2 mpg 13.3 319 2003
Voyager
3.3 Short Wheel Base · A4 · 3301 cc
Petrol 21.2 mpg 13.3 319 2003
Voyager
2.5 Long Wheel Base · M5 · 2499 cc
Diesel 36.7 mpg 7.7 210 2001–2002
Voyager
2.5 Short Wheel Base · M5 · 2499 cc
Diesel 36.7 mpg 7.7 210 2001–2002
Voyager
2.5Td Long Wheel Base · M5 · 2499 cc
Diesel 32.8 mpg 8.6 228 2000–2001
Voyager
2.5Td Short Wheel Base · M5 · 2499 cc
Diesel 32.8 mpg 8.6 228 2000–2001
Voyager
2.0L Short Wheel Base · M5 · 1995 cc
Petrol 29.1 mpg 9.7 229 2000–2001
Voyager
3.3L Long Wheel Base · A4 · 3301 cc
Petrol 23.0 mpg 12.3 287 2000–2001
Voyager
3.3L Short Wheel Base · A4 · 3301 cc
Petrol 23.0 mpg 12.3 287 2000–2001

Using these figures

"In lists" shows which yearly VCA lists include the version; it is not the model year. Manufacturers supply figures to the VCA voluntarily, so some makes are missing from some years' lists (for example several large brands between 2019 and 2024); a gap in the years does not mean the car was not sold. Click an mpg figure to open the trip fuel cost calculator with it in UK units, or convert it with the fuel economy converter. Real-world economy is usually lower than official figures — measure yours with the MPG calculator.

Tyre and wheel sizes for this model: Chrysler Voyager tyre sizes.

Source: Vehicle Certification Agency (VCA), Car Fuel Data — official data download (lists 2000–2009, downloaded 2026-10-22). © Crown copyright, reused under the licence published for this dataset on data.gov.uk (Creative Commons Attribution). Data processed by us (duplicates merged, model names tidied); the VCA is not responsible for our use of it. The VCA states that figures are supplied by manufacturers, may not be achieved in real-world driving, and are used at the user's own risk.